![]() ![]() |
| screeg neegis |
Feb 5 2010, 01:40 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Group: Members - Basic Posts: 2,472 Joined: February 13 04 Member No.: 1,859 |
New senator Scott Brown sure gets down to Republican business
By Dana Milbank Friday, February 5, 2010; A02 Great. Here comes one more model prone to sudden acceleration. Another Toyota? Actually, no. This one is Scott Brown, as of Thursday the junior senator from Massachusetts. Brown, the surprise victor in last month's special election, had raised no objection to taking his oath of office on Feb. 11. But then conservative commentators complained that he was dilly- dallying; the Boston Herald's Howie Carr accused him on Wednesday of taking "a three-week victory lap." So, in one of his first major decisions since winning election, the Republican made his choice: He would cave in to his conservative critics. He requested -- no, demanded! -- that he be seated promptly -- no, immediately! -- so that he could start to do the important work of being a senator. Democratic Senate leaders complied with his demand (they even let him have Ted Kennedy's primo office suite), and Vice President Biden made time to swear in Brown on the Senate floor at 5 p.m. Thursday. "It's really time to get to work," the new senator announced, certification papers in hand, as he got out of an SUV -- he left "the truck" at home -- outside the Russell Senate Office Building. And so Brown got down to work. His first official act after taking the oath: holding a news conference. The Senate, having no business left to conduct, went into a quorum call. Senators had already taken their last vote of the week and most were hurrying out of town for three days ahead of the snowstorm. Welcome to the Senate, Mr. Brown. Brown's surprise victory impressed many people, none more than Brown himself. He went on ABC News's "This Week" on Sunday and declined to rule out a run for the presidency. "I don't have any exploratory committees started," he demurred. The host, Barbara Walters, also showed him the three-decade-old copy of Cosmo in which he posed nude. "Do I regret doing that?" Brown asked. "No." Senator Centerfold's looks landed him in a "Saturday Night Live" skit over the weekend in which Brown, played by Jon Hamm, set off fantasies among Democratic leaders, and led House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's character to exclaim, "Oooh, Mama like." But they don't like the way he votes, so hours before Brown's arrival, Senate Democrats used their 60-vote majority one final time, breaking a Republican filibuster and confirming Patricia Smith to be solicitor in the Labor Department. Still, the urgency requiring the hastily arranged swearing-in ceremony was something of a puzzle. Democrats had already agreed that their health-care reform bill was dead, so that couldn't explain it. Was he rushing to town to vote against a jobs bill? That would be awkward, because Sen. Orrin Hatch, a Utah Republican, is a co-sponsor of one of its main provisions. He may have been in a hurry to block Obama's nominee to the National Labor Relations Board, but this was hardly top priority for Massachusetts voters. Brown's flight from Boston arrived about 2:30 p.m., and he sped to the Senate building, where he was met by the Capitol's official greeting party: CNN's Dana Bash, Fox News's Trish Turner and a huge media scrum. "Let's just step over a little bit and get everyone settled and we'll just do it the right way," the senator-elect told the mob. "Don't want anyone to get hurt." "Just so you know, we're live here," Bash warned him. "Oh, hi. Hi, everybody," he said to the TV audience. An hour before Brown's swearing-in, Sen. Paul Kirk (D-Mass.), the placeholder who had filled Kennedy's seat, gave his farewell on the Senate floor, an emotional appeal for "bipartisan comity." Eighteen Democratic senators stood and applauded. But Republicans let the majority know where they stood on the whole bipartisan comity thing: Not a single one of them came to hear Kirk's farewell. At 5 p.m., 21 Republicans ushered Brown, carrying his two daughters' bibles, out of the cloakroom and onto the floor, where eight Democratic senators and a trio of Democratic congressmen were good enough sports to participate in the swearing-in. Biden, who once teased Chief Justice John Roberts for bungling President Obama's oath of office, stumbled over the oath as he read it to Brown from a laminated card. "You're in," Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) told his new colleague. A few minutes later, after his wife got a chance to admire his new Senate lapel pin, Brown entered the jammed TV studio in a hail of camera flashes. Senator Centerfold laid out his positions. How might he work with Democrats? "I need to see what issues are coming up." His stance on gays in the military? "I want to speak to the generals in the field." A filibuster of the labor board nominee? "I'm going to look at everybody's qualifications." The jobs legislation? "I need to see what's in the bill." The one declarative position Brown did take -- "The last stimulus bill didn't create one new job" -- was demonstrably untrue. The self-styled "independent" senator spent the rest of the session repeating GOP talking points about tax cuts for all, going "back to the drawing board" on health-care reform, and being "the 41st vote" to sustain filibusters. Among reporters in the room, the judgment was widely shared: Brown will fit right in. -- © 2010 The Washington Post Company -- http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...0404009_pf.html - http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...id=opinionsbox1 |
| mfk |
Feb 5 2010, 02:02 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Noise Board Sponsor Group: Members - Bronze Posts: 11,428 Joined: June 21 03 Member No.: 87 |
there you go.
thanks a lot massachusetts! |
| Satan |
Feb 5 2010, 02:06 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Group: Members - Basic Posts: 1,869 Joined: June 16 04 Member No.: 3,001 |
Give him some time. Just you wait, he's going to make wondrous things happen for our state. Then you will wonder why we put up with Kennedy for so long! |
| mfk |
Feb 5 2010, 02:08 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Noise Board Sponsor Group: Members - Bronze Posts: 11,428 Joined: June 21 03 Member No.: 87 |
|
| Satan |
Feb 5 2010, 02:10 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Group: Members - Basic Posts: 1,869 Joined: June 16 04 Member No.: 3,001 |
|
| mfk |
Feb 5 2010, 02:13 PM
Post
#6
|
|
Noise Board Sponsor Group: Members - Bronze Posts: 11,428 Joined: June 21 03 Member No.: 87 |
|
| ImIdaho |
Feb 5 2010, 02:14 PM
Post
#7
|
|
Group: Members - Basic Posts: 14,806 Joined: May 17 05 Member No.: 5,497 |
I don't see anything negative about him in this article. What's your problem?
|
| LocalWiseMan |
Feb 5 2010, 02:16 PM
Post
#8
|
|
Noise Board Sponsor Group: Members - Platinum Posts: 6,056 Joined: February 14 05 From: Framingham Member No.: 4,906 |
QUOTE The one declarative position Brown did take -- "The last stimulus bill didn't create one new job" -- was demonstrably untrue. |
| Satan |
Feb 5 2010, 02:18 PM
Post
#9
|
|
Group: Members - Basic Posts: 1,869 Joined: June 16 04 Member No.: 3,001 |
|
| lusting_kay |
Feb 5 2010, 02:20 PM
Post
#10
|
|
Noise Board Forum Moderator Group: Members - Platinum Posts: 12,206 Joined: November 3 03 Member No.: 1,053 |
|
| m.f. |
Feb 5 2010, 02:21 PM
Post
#11
|
|
Group: Members - Basic Posts: 12,154 Joined: March 9 06 From: king of the burbs Member No.: 7,573 |
great. now we are going to get daily updates about how much scott brown sucks.
DEMS you are just as bad as the REPS with this shit, don't kid yourself |
| DanPM |
Feb 5 2010, 02:23 PM
Post
#12
|
|
Group: Members - Platinum Posts: 55,983 Joined: June 24 03 Member No.: 195 |
|
| screeg neegis |
Feb 5 2010, 02:24 PM
Post
#13
|
|
Group: Members - Basic Posts: 2,472 Joined: February 13 04 Member No.: 1,859 |
Scott Brown would impress me mightily if he speaks out and votes against THIS:
February 5, 2010 11:27 AM Richard Shelby Holds Up Senate for Home State Pork by Brian Montopoli CBS News The White House is slamming Republican Sen. Richard Shelby of Alabama for blocking Senate action on at least 70 of President Obama's nominations because he wants money for two projects in his home state. In a gaggle with reporters this morning, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said "if you needed one example of what?s wrong with this town, it might be that one senator can hold up 70 qualified individuals to make government work better because he didn?t get his earmarks." "It boggles the mind to hold up qualified nominees for positions that are needed to perform functions in a government because you didn?t get two earmarks," he added. A spokeswoman for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has confirmed to reporters that Shelby had put a "blanket hold" on most pending nominations. The reason? He wants to make sure his state gets money for a pair of lucrative defense contracts. One is a $35 billion contract to build an Air Force refueling tanker (more on that here), and the other an FBI explosives testing center that has not been built despite Shelby earmarking $45 million for it in 2008. A spokesman for Shelby called the projects "unaddressed national security concerns" in a statement to reporters. "Among his concerns is that nearly 10 years after the U.S. Air Force announced plans to replace the aging tanker fleet, we still do not have a transparent and fair acquisition process to move forward," said spokesman Jonathan Graffeo, according to the New York Times. "The Department of Defense must recognize that the draft Request for Proposal needs to be significantly and substantively changed." A so-called "blanket hold" is exceedingly rare and perhaps unprecedented. Mr. Obama and Democrats have been calling on Republicans to work with them on behalf of the American people in the wake of Scott Brown's election to the Senate, and Shelby's maneuver supports the White House's suggestion that the minority party is obstructionist and overly concerned with politics. It also cuts against the tide of fiscal conservatism that has risen on the right in the past two years and become associated with the Tea Party movement. http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2010/02/05/po...ry6177399.shtml |
| Mister Shhh |
Feb 5 2010, 02:25 PM
Post
#14
|
|
noise board d00d Group: Members - Platinum Posts: 29,393 Joined: August 29 05 Member No.: 6,147 |
|
| lusting_kay |
Feb 5 2010, 02:29 PM
Post
#15
|
|
Noise Board Forum Moderator Group: Members - Platinum Posts: 12,206 Joined: November 3 03 Member No.: 1,053 |
Scott Brown would impress me mightily if he speaks out and votes against THIS: February 5, 2010 11:27 AM Richard Shelby Holds Up Senate for Home State Pork by Brian Montopoli CBS News The White House is slamming Republican Sen. Richard Shelby of Alabama for blocking Senate action on at least 70 of President Obama's nominations because he wants money for two projects in his home state. In a gaggle with reporters this morning, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said "if you needed one example of what?s wrong with this town, it might be that one senator can hold up 70 qualified individuals to make government work better because he didn?t get his earmarks." "It boggles the mind to hold up qualified nominees for positions that are needed to perform functions in a government because you didn?t get two earmarks," he added. A spokeswoman for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has confirmed to reporters that Shelby had put a "blanket hold" on most pending nominations. The reason? He wants to make sure his state gets money for a pair of lucrative defense contracts. One is a $35 billion contract to build an Air Force refueling tanker (more on that here), and the other an FBI explosives testing center that has not been built despite Shelby earmarking $45 million for it in 2008. A spokesman for Shelby called the projects "unaddressed national security concerns" in a statement to reporters. "Among his concerns is that nearly 10 years after the U.S. Air Force announced plans to replace the aging tanker fleet, we still do not have a transparent and fair acquisition process to move forward," said spokesman Jonathan Graffeo, according to the New York Times. "The Department of Defense must recognize that the draft Request for Proposal needs to be significantly and substantively changed." A so-called "blanket hold" is exceedingly rare and perhaps unprecedented. Mr. Obama and Democrats have been calling on Republicans to work with them on behalf of the American people in the wake of Scott Brown's election to the Senate, and Shelby's maneuver supports the White House's suggestion that the minority party is obstructionist and overly concerned with politics. It also cuts against the tide of fiscal conservatism that has risen on the right in the past two years and become associated with the Tea Party movement. http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2010/02/05/po...ry6177399.shtml Translation... we only buy democrat votes asshole...so if you aint' from Nebraska and don't represent a union...get out of the way! |
| LocalWiseMan |
Feb 5 2010, 02:30 PM
Post
#16
|
|
Noise Board Sponsor Group: Members - Platinum Posts: 6,056 Joined: February 14 05 From: Framingham Member No.: 4,906 |
|
| Satan |
Feb 5 2010, 02:35 PM
Post
#17
|
|
Group: Members - Basic Posts: 1,869 Joined: June 16 04 Member No.: 3,001 |
|
| screeg neegis |
Feb 5 2010, 02:39 PM
Post
#18
|
|
Group: Members - Basic Posts: 2,472 Joined: February 13 04 Member No.: 1,859 |
|
| Fuzzface |
Feb 5 2010, 02:48 PM
Post
#19
|
|
Group: Members - Basic Posts: 116 Joined: October 5 07 Member No.: 16,458 |
Jesus, nothing has gotten better yet since this guy took office, what a failure.
|
| smcd |
Feb 5 2010, 02:53 PM
Post
#20
|
|
Noise Board Sponsor Group: Members - Platinum Posts: 35,524 Joined: March 13 04 Member No.: 2,180 |
Liberals desperate bid to attempt to tar Scott Brown. Laughably pathetic.
|
| lusting_kay |
Feb 5 2010, 02:54 PM
Post
#21
|
|
Noise Board Forum Moderator Group: Members - Platinum Posts: 12,206 Joined: November 3 03 Member No.: 1,053 |
|
| ImIdaho |
Feb 5 2010, 02:55 PM
Post
#22
|
|
Group: Members - Basic Posts: 14,806 Joined: May 17 05 Member No.: 5,497 |
|
| screeg neegis |
Feb 5 2010, 03:00 PM
Post
#23
|
|
Group: Members - Basic Posts: 2,472 Joined: February 13 04 Member No.: 1,859 |
I have a huge problem with this...I just think the outrage is a bit disingenuous given the buyouts you made for healthcare not more than a month ago. buyouts meaning funding expanded Medicaid? Oh yeah, the union thing too keep reaching - that is chicken feed compared to the favors the GOP wants to do for the insurance and banking industries. |
| ImIdaho |
Feb 5 2010, 03:02 PM
Post
#24
|
|
Group: Members - Basic Posts: 14,806 Joined: May 17 05 Member No.: 5,497 |
|
| screeg neegis |
Feb 5 2010, 03:04 PM
Post
#25
|
|
Group: Members - Basic Posts: 2,472 Joined: February 13 04 Member No.: 1,859 |
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: May 19th 2013 - 04:56 AM |