The Noise

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V  1 2 3 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Scott Brown will fit right in
screeg neegis
post Feb 5 2010, 01:40 PM
Post #1



Group Icon

Group: Members - Basic
Posts: 2,472
Joined: February 13 04
Member No.: 1,859



New senator Scott Brown sure gets down to Republican business

By Dana Milbank
Friday, February 5, 2010; A02



Great. Here comes one more model prone to sudden acceleration.

Another Toyota? Actually, no. This one is Scott Brown, as of Thursday the junior senator from
Massachusetts.

Brown, the surprise victor in last month's special election, had raised no objection to taking his
oath of office on Feb. 11. But then conservative commentators complained that he was dilly-
dallying; the Boston Herald's Howie Carr accused him on Wednesday of taking "a three-week victory
lap."

So, in one of his first major decisions since winning election, the Republican made his choice:
He would cave in to his conservative critics.

He requested -- no, demanded! -- that he be seated promptly -- no, immediately! -- so that he could
start to do the important work of being a senator.

Democratic Senate leaders complied with his demand (they even let him have Ted Kennedy's primo office
suite), and Vice President Biden made time to swear in Brown on the Senate floor at 5 p.m. Thursday.

"It's really time to get to work," the new senator announced, certification papers in hand, as he got
out of an SUV -- he left "the truck" at home -- outside the Russell Senate Office Building.

And so Brown got down to work. His first official act after taking the oath: holding a news
conference. The Senate, having no business left to conduct, went into a quorum call. Senators had
already taken their last vote of the week and most were hurrying out of town for three days ahead of
the snowstorm.

Welcome to the Senate, Mr. Brown.

Brown's surprise victory impressed many people, none more than Brown himself. He went on ABC
News's "This Week" on Sunday and declined to rule out a run for the presidency. "I don't have any
exploratory committees started," he demurred.

The host, Barbara Walters, also showed him the three-decade-old copy of Cosmo in which he posed nude.
"Do I regret doing that?" Brown asked. "No."

Senator Centerfold's looks landed him in a "Saturday Night Live" skit over the weekend in which Brown, played by Jon Hamm, set off fantasies among Democratic leaders, and led House Speaker
Nancy Pelosi's character to exclaim, "Oooh, Mama like."

But they don't like the way he votes, so hours before Brown's arrival, Senate Democrats used their 60-vote majority one final time, breaking a Republican filibuster and confirming Patricia Smith to be solicitor in the Labor Department.

Still, the urgency requiring the hastily arranged swearing-in ceremony was something of a puzzle.

Democrats had already agreed that their health-care reform bill was dead, so that couldn't
explain it.

Was he rushing to town to vote against a jobs bill? That would be awkward, because Sen. Orrin
Hatch, a Utah Republican, is a co-sponsor of one of its main provisions.

He may have been in a hurry to block Obama's nominee to the National Labor Relations Board, but this was hardly top priority for Massachusetts voters.

Brown's flight from Boston arrived about 2:30 p.m., and he sped to the Senate building, where he
was met by the Capitol's official greeting party: CNN's Dana Bash, Fox News's Trish Turner and a
huge media scrum.

"Let's just step over a little bit and get everyone settled and we'll just do it the right way," the senator-elect told the mob. "Don't want anyone to get hurt."

"Just so you know, we're live here," Bash warned him.

"Oh, hi. Hi, everybody," he said to the TV audience.

An hour before Brown's swearing-in, Sen. Paul Kirk (D-Mass.), the placeholder who had filled
Kennedy's seat, gave his farewell on the Senate floor, an emotional appeal for "bipartisan comity." Eighteen Democratic senators stood and applauded.

But Republicans let the majority know where they stood on the whole bipartisan comity thing: Not a single one of them came to hear Kirk's farewell.

At 5 p.m., 21 Republicans ushered Brown, carrying his two daughters' bibles, out of the cloakroom and onto the floor, where eight Democratic senators and a trio of Democratic congressmen were good enough sports to participate in the swearing-in. Biden, who once teased Chief Justice John Roberts for bungling President Obama's oath of office, stumbled over the oath as he read it to Brown from a laminated card.

"You're in," Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) told his new colleague.

A few minutes later, after his wife got a chance to admire his new Senate lapel pin, Brown entered the jammed TV studio in a hail of camera flashes.

Senator Centerfold laid out his positions. How might he work with Democrats? "I need to see what
issues are coming up." His stance on gays in the military? "I want to speak to the generals in the
field." A filibuster of the labor board nominee? "I'm going to look at everybody's qualifications."
The jobs legislation? "I need to see what's in the bill."

The one declarative position Brown did take -- "The last stimulus bill didn't create one new job"
-- was demonstrably untrue.

The self-styled "independent" senator spent the rest of the session repeating GOP talking points
about tax cuts for all, going "back to the drawing board" on health-care reform, and being "the 41st
vote" to sustain filibusters.

Among reporters in the room, the judgment was widely shared: Brown will fit right in.
--
© 2010 The Washington Post Company
--
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...0404009_pf.html
-
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...id=opinionsbox1
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mfk
post Feb 5 2010, 02:02 PM
Post #2


Noise Board Sponsor
Group Icon

Group: Members - Bronze
Posts: 11,428
Joined: June 21 03
Member No.: 87



there you go.
thanks a lot massachusetts!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Satan
post Feb 5 2010, 02:06 PM
Post #3



Group Icon

Group: Members - Basic
Posts: 1,869
Joined: June 16 04
Member No.: 3,001




Give him some time. Just you wait, he's going to make wondrous things happen for our state. Then you will wonder why we put up with Kennedy for so long!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mfk
post Feb 5 2010, 02:08 PM
Post #4


Noise Board Sponsor
Group Icon

Group: Members - Bronze
Posts: 11,428
Joined: June 21 03
Member No.: 87



QUOTE(Satan @ Feb 5 2010, 02:06 PM) *

Give him some time. Just you wait, he's going to make wondrous things happen for our state. Then you will wonder why we put up with Kennedy for so long!


like WHAT, exactly?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Satan
post Feb 5 2010, 02:10 PM
Post #5



Group Icon

Group: Members - Basic
Posts: 1,869
Joined: June 16 04
Member No.: 3,001



QUOTE(mfk @ Feb 5 2010, 02:08 PM) *

like WHAT, exactly?

I don't kiss and tell. Just you wait.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mfk
post Feb 5 2010, 02:13 PM
Post #6


Noise Board Sponsor
Group Icon

Group: Members - Bronze
Posts: 11,428
Joined: June 21 03
Member No.: 87



QUOTE(Satan @ Feb 5 2010, 02:10 PM) *

I don't kiss and tell. Just you wait.


that's what i thought.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ImIdaho
post Feb 5 2010, 02:14 PM
Post #7



Group Icon

Group: Members - Basic
Posts: 14,806
Joined: May 17 05
Member No.: 5,497



I don't see anything negative about him in this article. What's your problem?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
LocalWiseMan
post Feb 5 2010, 02:16 PM
Post #8


Noise Board Sponsor
Group Icon

Group: Members - Platinum
Posts: 6,056
Joined: February 14 05
From: Framingham
Member No.: 4,906



QUOTE
The one declarative position Brown did take -- "The last stimulus bill didn't create one new job"
-- was demonstrably untrue.
rolleyes.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Satan
post Feb 5 2010, 02:18 PM
Post #9



Group Icon

Group: Members - Basic
Posts: 1,869
Joined: June 16 04
Member No.: 3,001



QUOTE(mfk @ Feb 5 2010, 02:13 PM) *

that's what i thought.

You think nothing.


But constant thoughts. Of. Me.


Satan.


Continue with this as you go about your day, with the lights ON.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
lusting_kay
post Feb 5 2010, 02:20 PM
Post #10


Noise Board Forum Moderator
Group Icon

Group: Members - Platinum
Posts: 12,206
Joined: November 3 03
Member No.: 1,053



QUOTE(ImIdaho @ Feb 5 2010, 02:14 PM) *

I don't see anything negative about him in this article. What's your problem?


you didn't see!?

they called him senator centerfold!

scathing.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
m.f.
post Feb 5 2010, 02:21 PM
Post #11



Group Icon

Group: Members - Basic
Posts: 12,154
Joined: March 9 06
From: king of the burbs
Member No.: 7,573



great. now we are going to get daily updates about how much scott brown sucks.

DEMS you are just as bad as the REPS with this shit, don't kid yourself

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
DanPM
post Feb 5 2010, 02:23 PM
Post #12



Group Icon

Group: Members - Platinum
Posts: 55,983
Joined: June 24 03
Member No.: 195



QUOTE(m.f. @ Feb 5 2010, 02:21 PM) *

great. now we are going to get daily updates about how much scott brown sucks.

DEMS you are just as bad as the REPS with this shit, don't kid yourself

did you see what happened to the stock market since he got elected ... the guy is killing us
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
screeg neegis
post Feb 5 2010, 02:24 PM
Post #13



Group Icon

Group: Members - Basic
Posts: 2,472
Joined: February 13 04
Member No.: 1,859



Scott Brown would impress me mightily if he speaks out and votes against THIS:


February 5, 2010 11:27 AM
Richard Shelby Holds Up Senate for Home State Pork
by Brian Montopoli
CBS News

The White House is slamming Republican Sen. Richard Shelby of Alabama for blocking Senate action on at least 70 of President Obama's nominations because he wants money for two projects in his home state.

In a gaggle with reporters this morning, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said "if you needed one example of what?s wrong with this town, it might be that one senator can hold up 70 qualified individuals to make government work better because he didn?t get his earmarks."

"It boggles the mind to hold up qualified nominees for positions that are needed to perform functions in a government because you didn?t get two earmarks," he added.

A spokeswoman for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has confirmed to reporters that Shelby had put a "blanket hold" on most pending nominations.

The reason? He wants to make sure his state gets money for a pair of lucrative defense contracts.

One is a $35 billion contract to build an Air Force refueling tanker (more on that here), and the other an FBI explosives testing center that has not been built despite Shelby earmarking $45 million for it in 2008.

A spokesman for Shelby called the projects "unaddressed national security concerns" in a statement to reporters.

"Among his concerns is that nearly 10 years after the U.S. Air Force announced plans to replace the aging tanker fleet, we still do not have a transparent and fair acquisition process to move forward," said spokesman Jonathan Graffeo, according to the New York Times. "The Department of Defense must recognize that the draft Request for Proposal needs to be significantly and substantively changed."

A so-called "blanket hold" is exceedingly rare and perhaps unprecedented.

Mr. Obama and Democrats have been calling on Republicans to work with them on behalf of the American people in the wake of Scott Brown's election to the Senate, and Shelby's maneuver supports the White House's suggestion that the minority party is obstructionist and overly concerned with politics.

It also cuts against the tide of fiscal conservatism that has risen on the right in the past two years and become associated with the Tea Party movement.
http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2010/02/05/po...ry6177399.shtml
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mister Shhh
post Feb 5 2010, 02:25 PM
Post #14


noise board d00d
Group Icon

Group: Members - Platinum
Posts: 29,393
Joined: August 29 05
Member No.: 6,147



QUOTE(Satan @ Feb 5 2010, 02:18 PM) *

I'm a grown man that plays pretend on a message board. God what the fuck happened to my life?



laughing.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
lusting_kay
post Feb 5 2010, 02:29 PM
Post #15


Noise Board Forum Moderator
Group Icon

Group: Members - Platinum
Posts: 12,206
Joined: November 3 03
Member No.: 1,053



QUOTE(screeg neegis @ Feb 5 2010, 02:24 PM) *

Scott Brown would impress me mightily if he speaks out and votes against THIS:
February 5, 2010 11:27 AM
Richard Shelby Holds Up Senate for Home State Pork
by Brian Montopoli
CBS News

The White House is slamming Republican Sen. Richard Shelby of Alabama for blocking Senate action on at least 70 of President Obama's nominations because he wants money for two projects in his home state.

In a gaggle with reporters this morning, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said "if you needed one example of what?s wrong with this town, it might be that one senator can hold up 70 qualified individuals to make government work better because he didn?t get his earmarks."

"It boggles the mind to hold up qualified nominees for positions that are needed to perform functions in a government because you didn?t get two earmarks," he added.

A spokeswoman for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has confirmed to reporters that Shelby had put a "blanket hold" on most pending nominations.

The reason? He wants to make sure his state gets money for a pair of lucrative defense contracts.

One is a $35 billion contract to build an Air Force refueling tanker (more on that here), and the other an FBI explosives testing center that has not been built despite Shelby earmarking $45 million for it in 2008.

A spokesman for Shelby called the projects "unaddressed national security concerns" in a statement to reporters.

"Among his concerns is that nearly 10 years after the U.S. Air Force announced plans to replace the aging tanker fleet, we still do not have a transparent and fair acquisition process to move forward," said spokesman Jonathan Graffeo, according to the New York Times. "The Department of Defense must recognize that the draft Request for Proposal needs to be significantly and substantively changed."

A so-called "blanket hold" is exceedingly rare and perhaps unprecedented.

Mr. Obama and Democrats have been calling on Republicans to work with them on behalf of the American people in the wake of Scott Brown's election to the Senate, and Shelby's maneuver supports the White House's suggestion that the minority party is obstructionist and overly concerned with politics.

It also cuts against the tide of fiscal conservatism that has risen on the right in the past two years and become associated with the Tea Party movement.
http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2010/02/05/po...ry6177399.shtml


Translation...

we only buy democrat votes asshole...so if you aint' from Nebraska and don't represent a union...get out of the way!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
LocalWiseMan
post Feb 5 2010, 02:30 PM
Post #16


Noise Board Sponsor
Group Icon

Group: Members - Platinum
Posts: 6,056
Joined: February 14 05
From: Framingham
Member No.: 4,906



QUOTE(DanPM @ Feb 5 2010, 02:23 PM) *

did you see what happened to the stock market since he got elected ... the guy is killing us

His campaign ads said he had a PLAN to solve our fiscal problems. So where's the ACTION?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Satan
post Feb 5 2010, 02:35 PM
Post #17



Group Icon

Group: Members - Basic
Posts: 1,869
Joined: June 16 04
Member No.: 3,001



QUOTE(Mister Shhh @ Feb 5 2010, 02:25 PM) *

laughing.gif

Yes this is exactly true!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
screeg neegis
post Feb 5 2010, 02:39 PM
Post #18



Group Icon

Group: Members - Basic
Posts: 2,472
Joined: February 13 04
Member No.: 1,859



QUOTE(lusting_kay @ Feb 5 2010, 02:29 PM) *

Translation...

we only buy democrat votes asshole...so if you aint' from Nebraska and don't represent a union...get out of the way!

Translation: I has no problims wit Republicin Pork
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Fuzzface
post Feb 5 2010, 02:48 PM
Post #19



Group Icon

Group: Members - Basic
Posts: 116
Joined: October 5 07
Member No.: 16,458



Jesus, nothing has gotten better yet since this guy took office, what a failure.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
smcd
post Feb 5 2010, 02:53 PM
Post #20


Noise Board Sponsor
Group Icon

Group: Members - Platinum
Posts: 35,524
Joined: March 13 04
Member No.: 2,180



Liberals desperate bid to attempt to tar Scott Brown. Laughably pathetic.




User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
lusting_kay
post Feb 5 2010, 02:54 PM
Post #21


Noise Board Forum Moderator
Group Icon

Group: Members - Platinum
Posts: 12,206
Joined: November 3 03
Member No.: 1,053



QUOTE(screeg neegis @ Feb 5 2010, 02:39 PM) *

Translation: I has no problims wit Republicin Pork


I have a huge problem with this...I just think the outrage is a bit disingenuous given the buyouts you made for healthcare not more than a month ago.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ImIdaho
post Feb 5 2010, 02:55 PM
Post #22



Group Icon

Group: Members - Basic
Posts: 14,806
Joined: May 17 05
Member No.: 5,497



QUOTE(lusting_kay @ Feb 5 2010, 02:54 PM) *

I have a huge problem with this...I just think the outrage is a bit disingenuous given the buyouts you made for healthcare not more than a month ago.

No shit.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
screeg neegis
post Feb 5 2010, 03:00 PM
Post #23



Group Icon

Group: Members - Basic
Posts: 2,472
Joined: February 13 04
Member No.: 1,859



QUOTE(lusting_kay @ Feb 5 2010, 02:54 PM) *

I have a huge problem with this...I just think the outrage is a bit disingenuous given the buyouts you made for healthcare not more than a month ago.

buyouts meaning funding expanded Medicaid?


Oh yeah, the union thing too



keep reaching - that is chicken feed compared to the favors the GOP wants to do for the insurance and banking industries.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ImIdaho
post Feb 5 2010, 03:02 PM
Post #24



Group Icon

Group: Members - Basic
Posts: 14,806
Joined: May 17 05
Member No.: 5,497



QUOTE(screeg neegis @ Feb 5 2010, 03:00 PM) *

buyouts meaning funding expanded Medicaid?
Oh yeah, the union thing too
keep reaching - that is chicken feed compared to the favors the GOP wants to do for the insurance and banking industries.

Oh, is that the spin they put on it? laughing.gif laughing.gif laughing.gif laughing.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
screeg neegis
post Feb 5 2010, 03:04 PM
Post #25



Group Icon

Group: Members - Basic
Posts: 2,472
Joined: February 13 04
Member No.: 1,859



QUOTE(ImIdaho @ Feb 5 2010, 03:02 PM) *

Oh, is that the spin they put on it? laughing.gif laughing.gif laughing.gif laughing.gif

ha ha ha again

is true
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

3 Pages V  1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: May 19th 2013 - 04:56 AM