I'm John McCain and I approve this message, P.O.W. & P.O.S. Options

[HomerRamone]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IH0xzsogzAk

[mfk]

see, i'm amazed that the media isn't picking up on THIS story. A presidential candidate for the united states is LYING to the public on a daily basis.

[smcd]

Don't you nitwits get tired of this stupid shit??

[DanPM]

Don't you nitwits get tired of this stupid shit??

http://www.theonion.com/content/node/30624

[mfk]

Don't you nitwits get tired of this stupid shit??

I'm sorry, i kind of give a fuck about the future.

[mhaverty]

I'm sorry, i kind of give a fuck about the future.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l8MCtLwIUBI...feature=related

[Danny Vermin]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l8MCtLwIUBI...feature=related

I don't get it.

He said he didn't have a problem with 100, and went on to compound it with citing how long we've been in Japan, etc.

How is what Obama said a lie?

[mfk]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l8MCtLwIUBI...feature=related

ummm... how does Obama calling john mccain on suggesting that we could be in iraq for a hundred years (even with mccain's 'qualification') constitute a lie?

[mhaverty]

I don't get it.

He said he didn't have a problem with 100, and went on to compound it with citing how long we've been in Japan, etc.

How is what Obama said a lie?

Because there is a huge difference between being at war for a hundred years where troops are being killed and what our troops have done in Japan, Germany, and in the DMZ for the last 4 to 5 decades.

Here lets spell it out a little more clearly for you:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pPYBL1DkQDI

"It is fine with me as long as american troops are not being killed" - John McCain

[Danny Vermin]

ummm... how does Obama calling john mccain on suggesting that we could be in iraq for a hundred years (even with mccain's 'qualification') constitute a lie?

It doesn't.

This is no different than saying Obama's 12 years of experience is less than Palin's 1 and 1/2 years of experience.

[Danny Vermin]

Because there is a huge difference between being at war for a hundred years where troops are being killed and what our troops have done in Japan, Germany, and in the DMZ for the last 4 to 5 decades.

Here lets spell it out a little more clearly for you:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pPYBL1DkQDI

"It is fine with me as long as american troops are not being killed" - John McCain

You can argue the semantics all you want.

the McCain ad claiming that Obama wants to tech kids "Sex Ed" is a straight up lie. No sematics being mixed up at all. Just a straight lie.

[mhaverty]

You can argue the semantics all you want.

the McCain ad claiming that Obama wants to tech kids "Sex Ed" is a straight up lie. No sematics being mixed up at all. Just a straight lie.

You are smart enough to understand why it is a gross lie. I'm not even going to argue this with you.

Same for this lie:

It doesn't.

This is no different than saying Obama's 12 years of experience is less than Palin's 1 and 1/2 years of experience.

Obama's record is just as thin as Palins. Not worse. Not better. Just weak.

[Atom Brain]

You are smart enough to understand why it is a gross lie. I'm not even going to argue this with you.

Same for this lie:
Obama's record is just as thin as Palins. Not worse. Not better. Just weak.

Do you think the McCain ad concerning kindergartens was responsible or a gross misrepresentation or someone where in between?

[smcd]

I don't get it.

He said he didn't have a problem with 100, and went on to compound it with citing how long we've been in Japan, etc.

How is what Obama said a lie?

Obama is stating that McCain "favors 100 more years of war in Iraq".


That's not what McCain said.

[smcd]

It doesn't.

This is no different than saying Obama's 12 years of experience is less than Palin's 1 and 1/2 years of experience.

I have 20 years of "experience". I should be President.

[mark lind]

Obama is stating that McCain "favors 100 more years of war in Iraq".
That's not what McCain said.

McCain's 100 years bit is about occupying the country. Some people believe if we stay there then we will continue to piss people off and bait attacks. Thus 100 more years of war or at least violence.

[woof.]

I have 20 years of "experience". I should be President.

I'd vote for you before I voted for cindy Palin.

[smcd]

McCain's 100 years bit is about occupying the country. Some people believe if we stay there then we will continue to piss people off and bait attacks. Thus 100 more years of war or at least violence.

No.

McCain clearly states that US troops will be based there "as long as Americans aren't being injured or harmed or wounded or killed". Thus, if there is violence, US troops will be gone.

[smcd]

I'd vote for you before I voted for cindy Palin.

I can guarantee you that after 6 months of me in office, you'd be wishing the opposite.

[DanPM]

I can guarantee you that after 6 months of me in office, you'd be wishing the opposite.

is that when you'd sign the "PUT WOOF IN PRISON" initiative?

[smcd]

is that when you'd sign the "PUT WOOF IN PRISON" initiative?

I'd assign a special FBI squad to fuck with him. Not for any other reason than to give his bug-nutty paranoid side something to actually worry about.

[HomerRamone]

No.

McCain clearly states that US troops will be based there "as long as Americans aren't being injured or harmed or wounded or killed". Thus, if there is violence, US troops will be gone.

Cut and run?

[mhaverty]

McCain's 100 years bit is about occupying the country. Some people believe if we stay there then we will continue to piss people off and bait attacks. Thus 100 more years of war or at least violence.

Do we occupy Japan? Germany? South Korea? Violence there?

[mhaverty]

Cut and run?

You know for somebody who portends to be serious as a heart attack you give some 11 year old answers on occasion.

[Arz]

You know for somebody who portends to be serious as a heart attack you give some 11 year old answers on occasion.

You're new at this internet message board thing, right?